What is p(doom)?
A clear guide to p(doom): what the shorthand means, why estimates vary, and why it is a personal judgment rather than a scientific measurement.
Read the guideA source-led field guide to p(doom), p(hack), alignment, power-seeking, takeoff, and AI takeover scenarios. We separate technical ideas, open expert debates, and speculation—because they do not carry the same evidence.
independent guides
Built for curious readers, students, researchers, and players who want to inspect the assumptions beneath a scenario.
Define p(doom), disambiguate p(hack), and understand what alignment researchers are trying to solve.
Begin hereExamine why capability growth, power-seeking incentives, and takeoff speed change the shape of risk.
Begin hereSeparate malicious use, competitive races, organizational failure, and loss-of-control theories.
Begin hereA clear guide to p(doom): what the shorthand means, why estimates vary, and why it is a personal judgment rather than a scientific measurement.
Read the guideP(hack) is not a standard AI safety metric. Learn the two risks it can describe: AI-enabled hacking and advanced AI systems being compromised.
Read the guideUnderstand the AI alignment problem: why specifying human intent is difficult, how proxies fail, and what researchers mean by aligned AI.
Read the guideA balanced explanation of instrumental convergence, the orthogonality thesis, and why many different AI goals could produce similar power-seeking strategies.
Read the guideCompare fast and slow AI takeoff theories, why the speed of capability growth matters, and what each scenario implies for safety and governance.
Read the guideA grounded guide to AI takeover and doomsday scenarios, from malicious use and competitive races to loss of control and structural risks.
Read the guideP(Doomed) is a speculative sandbox, not a prediction engine. Use it to explore how resources, factions, alignment failures, and human responses interact.